Ask a new question or post a poll.
Answers. Every Question Deserves a Great Answer

News: Fix for answers that wouldn't save

by neilychops on August 8th, 2009

neilychops

Question

Help answer this question below.

Is it just me or was Peter Jacksons King Kong remake a big pile of monkey dung?

Answers. 4 helpful answers below.

  • by Sid on August 9th, 2009

    Sid

    It was.....okay. It's the type of film that if it comes on TV I'll put it on and read or go on the internet or something and look up now and again at the interesting bits, but it's far too long with a lot of its length being padding out. Some films can be three or four hours long but need to be and wouldn't be as good if shorter, but this felt like it was long simply so it could be described as "epic".

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by CaffeineMonkey on August 8th, 2009

    CaffeineMonkey

    It was long and tiring for me. But it was still decent.

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Anonymous on August 8th, 2009

    Anonymous

    Monkey Dung?!

    Nope, it was more powerful than that...a big pile of gorilla crap, for sure! ;) hee

    I appreciate your politeness though. POINTS!!! :)

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by anguilla on August 8th, 2009

    anguilla

    It's just you. It was too long, but fun (to me). And I was startled that the 3 hours and 8 minutes didn't feel that long. However, if you didn't like it, then your opinion is 100% as valid as anyone else's!!

Did this answer your question? If not, then ask a new question or create a poll.

More Questions. Additional questions in this category.

You're reading Is it just me or was Peter Jacksons King Kong remake a big pile of monkey dung?

Related Ads