Ask a new question or post a poll.
Answers. Every Question Deserves a Great Answer

News: Fix for answers that wouldn't save

Debate

Who Should be the Next Supreme Court Justice?

After nearly two decades on the bench, Justice David Souter, widely regarded as a surprise liberal, will retire from the Supreme Court in the summer of 2009. The High Court can have an enormous influence on the everyday lives of Americans, so President Barack Obama's replacement for Souter will be one of the most important decisions of his presidency. Who should the next Supreme Court justice be, and what values should they protect and promote?

Justice Must Protect Women

By: Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice

Souter Retirement a Blow to Reproductive Justice



By Rev. Veazey, President and CEO Religious Coalition for Reproductive

Choice

As a faithful

advocate for women and families, the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice

urges President Obama to replace the liberal Souter with another consistent

supporter of reproductive rights.

The U.S. Supreme Court - the highest

court in our land - is the protector of fundamental rights that ensure the

safety, security, and freedoms of all Americans. While the Supreme Court

supports the underlying principles of Roe v. Wade, it does so by the razor-thin

margin of 5-4. (Justice Souter is counted as a supporter of Roe.) Given that

narrow balance, President Obama's nominee should recognize that there are a wide

range of religious beliefs and moral views about abortion and other

reproductive decisions and no one viewpoint should be enshrined in law above all others. The

Supreme Court must protect the fundamental right of women to make reproductive

health

decisions in keeping with their religious beliefs and conscience.

The

decisions made by the Supreme Court directly influence the lives of every

American, but vulnerable populations often have the most at stake. In recent

years, women have lost protections for their reproductive health and safety at

the hands of the Supreme Court, and more threats loom on the horizon.

Just two years ago, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Gonzales v. Carhart to

uphold the Federal Abortion Ban, which, for the first time, banned a specific

medical procedure without an exception for a woman's health.Anti-choice forces have been working tirelessly in several states to pass

"fetal rights" measures in hopes that such legislation will be challenged in

court and the Supreme Court will eventually be forced to reexamine - and

overturn - Roe.

We Need More Souters

By: Americans United

Next Justice Should be a Champion of Seperation of Church and State



Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter has been a great champion of separation of church and state . His replacement should be as well.

Much to the dismay of the far right, Souter was never a conservative ideologue. On issues of church-state separation and individual freedom, he angered the Religious Right by refusing to endorse its theocratic vision. In some cases, he provided the pivotal vote that prevented erosion of the church-state wall.

Souter embodies the qualities that make an effective justice – qualities President Barack Obama would do well to look for when considering Souter’s replacement. Like Souter, the next high court justice must have a keen intellect and can’t be afraid to use it. Souter was rarely content to simply endorse another justice’s opinion. He often wrote separately to explain his own thinking.

His replacement should be equally willing to explain his or her legal reasoning. The Supreme Court remains closely divided over issues of church and state. The new justice should be an unabashed supporter of that principle, someone who doesn’t hesitate to spar with Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas and soundly debunk their ill-informed attacks on the church-state wall.

Our next justice should also understand and appreciate the twin guarantee of freedom embodied in the religion rights.

Obama must do his best to find a justice who honors, respects and reflects the values the New Hampshire jurist championed. It’s imperative that the church-state views of potential nominees be ascertained well in advance. Any who fail to support that principle should be rejected.

Some might argue that this is a “litmus test.” If so, it’s a reasonable one. Isn’t it to be expected that we would require a nominee for the highest court in the land to unashamedly and forthrightly express support for basic constitutional principles? Most Americans would look askance at a nominee who blithely dismissed freedom of speech or the right to a fair trial. They should do the same with a potential justice who disregards the separation of church and state.

Americans United is not interested in naming names at this point. The American legal system is huge. We are confident that within this system, there are many men and women who embody the values espoused by Justice Souter. Obama should make sure he finds one.

Answers. 1 helpful answers below.

    • by johnsmith290 on December 23rd, 2009
      voted: Justice Must Protect Women

      johnsmith290

      me

      No comments. Post one | Permalink

More Questions. Additional questions in this category.